James M. Spiers1, Patrick O. Pittman2,
John H. Braswell3
1U Braswell3
1USDA ARS Small Fruit Research Station, P. O. Box 287,
Poplarville, MS 39470
2Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS
39762
3Miss. Cooperative Extension Service, P. O. Box 193,
Poplarville, MS 39470
Keywords: Southern highbush blueberry, northern highbush
blueberry, rabbiteye blueberry, lowbush blueberry, blueberry market
outlets, bramble, erect-thorny blackberry, erect-thornless blackberry,
trailing blackberry, red-spring raspberry, red-fall raspberry,
purple and black raspberry, bramble market outlets, June-bearing
strawberry, ever bearing strawberry, day-neutral strawberry, strawberry
market outlets, small fruit production, small fruit research.
Current small-fruit (excluding grapes) production characteristics
and research efforts are compiled from small-fruit-survey respondents
from the contiguous United States. This report documents fruit
type, current acreage, prospective 2008 acreage, market outlet,
and research efforts for blueberries, brambles (blackberries and
raspberries), and strawberries by responding states.
Like any other agricultural crop, small fruit production from any given year to any other year has always been variable. However, when recorded over a series of years, general trends emerge. In 1994, Jameorded over a series of years, general trends emerge. In 1994, James N. Moore documented trends in the then current blueberry industry by performing a survey report of production and research. To arrive at similar information for small fruit industry of 1998, this research report was created. The current pattern in small fruit production predicts a trend toward greater popularity and gradual but continually greater disbursement (Galletta and Hemilrick, 1990).
To record the small fruit (excluding grapes) industry's position
in this pattern, information is needed from the states that are
contributing to such a national trend. By recording the current
status of production area and research efforts in the small fruit
industry, this report establishes a compilation of information
for the 1998 small fruit industry. By documenting industry expectations
for the year 2008, this report also records the current thought
on small fruit's pace in a trend of popularity growth and gradually
increasing disbursement
To record the current state of small fruit production and research,
surveys were sent to representatives of 46 states (continental
U.S. excluding WY and ID). The surveys requested information for
blueberry, bramble, and strawberry types on current acreage dedicated
to production, speculative acreage for the year 2008, research
effort, and market outlet. Respondents could also provide information
ooutlet. Respondents could also provide information
on other non-grape fruit crops.
Partial or complete responses were received for 37 states (Table 1.1).
From the information provided in these surveys, production acreage
amounts, market outlet percentages, and research program status
were compiled.
Blueberries: Of the 43 states that reported or were researched (Table 1.1 and 1.2), 30 have at least 100 acres of blueberries. Only Maine reported wild lowbush blueberries, and the state's 60,000 acres account for more than half of the total production area. All major producers of rabbiteye are in the southern region with Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas and Louisiana accounting for 8,337 acres, 98% of total rabbiteye acreage. Florida dominates southern highbush production with 1000 acres estimated, 80% of total acreage and predicts a 400% increase in ten years to 5000 acres. The combined northern highbush area in Oregon, New Jersey, Michigan, and North Carolina accounts for 88% of production acreage for this type. Wisconsin reported 30 acres of half-high blueberries. Domestic blueberries made up 46 % of reported blueberry acreage.
Overall, only one state, New Hampshire, predicted a decrease in blueberry acreage by 2008. All types of c a decrease in blueberry acreage by 2008. All types of cultivated blueberries were predicted to increase in area planted by the year 2008. Wild lowbush production is predicted to remain at 60,000 acres. Of the cultivated types, the rabbiteye and southern highbush species are predicted to claim a larger share of the total cultivated market. Southern highbush is predicted to increase from 1,300 acres, 2% of the total market, to, 6,500 acres, 10% of the future market; rabbiteye will increase from 8,500 acres, 18%, to 12,600 acres or 21%, and northern highbush is predicted to change from current acreage of 36,500, 79% of the market, to 40,645 acres or 69%. Blueberry production by type is not predicted to change greatly from traditional regions, but Washington and Oregon predict 100 acres each of rabbiteye by 2008.
Brambles: Of the 36 states reporting, 26 indicated some acreage devoted to bramble production (Table 2.1). Oregon and Washington account for 78% of total bramble acreage with 11,640 and 8,635 acres respectively. Other major producers include New York with 950 acres or 4% of production area; Michigan, 845 acres, 3%; Ohio, 710 acres, 3%; Pennsylvania 620 acres, 2% and Minnesota with 400 acres, 2% of total bramble production area.
Bramble acreage currently stands at 26,544 and is predicted to increase 8% to 28,688 by 2008. Arkansas, currently representing 0.6% of bramble area, predicts a rise to 560 acres in f bramble area, predicts a rise to 560 acres in ten years or 2% of total bramble acreage.
Currently, blackberries account for 37% of all bramble production area. Projections for 2008 predict blackberries will account for 39% of bramble acreage with 11,094 acres. Within blackberry types (Table 2.2), erect thorny variety currently accounts for 11% of blackberry acreage with 1354 acres. Predictions for 2008 reduce this area share to 9%. erect thornless currently holds 9%, but is predicted to increase to 14%. Semi-erect currently accounts for 2% and will increase to 3%. Trailing blackberry area is predicted to decrease from 78%, 7,025 acres to 74%, 7,550 acres.
Raspberries hold 63% of total bramble acreage with 16,963 acres. By 2008, this share is predicted to fall to 61% for a total area of 17,508 acres. Red-spring currently accounts for 78% of raspberry acreage with 13,128 acres and is predicted to decrease to 74% by 2008. Red-fall area will increase from 13% of total acreage to 15%. Purple and black acreage currently accounts for 9% and is predicted to increase to 11% of production acreage.
Strawberries: Strawberries are grown in 26 reporting states (Table 3.1).
California accounts for 47% of strawberry acreage with 24,163 acres. Florida, New York, North Carolina, and Oregon each have over 3,000 acres of strawberries and collectively account for 32% of the total producd collectively account for 32% of the total production area, 16,430 acres. California and Florida make up 54% of total June bearing acreage with 22,880 acres. California also claims 78% of total day neutral area, 6,463 and 71% of ever bearing with 750 acres. North Carolina's 300 acres account for 29% of ever bearing acreage.
Strawberry acreage (Table 3.2) is predicted to increase by 1% to 54,197 acres in 2008. Area shares for types will not change significantly (<1%). Currently, June bearing strawberries account for 82%, day neutrals make up 16%, and ever bearing varieties claim 2% of total acreage.
Other small fruit (Table 4): The most commonly
reported other small fruit area was cranberry acreage, totaling
36,920 for 1998 and predicted to increase for those states that
provided 2008 figures. Other small fruit crops were also predicted
to increase by 2008.
Blueberries: While 70% of the total blueberry crop is processed, only 35% of cultivated varieties are processed. 99% of the wild crop is processed. Fresh market outlets receive 55% of the cultivated blueberry crop, and pick-your-own outlets represent 10% of the cultivated crop.
Brambles: Washington and Oregon account for approximately 14,000 acres of processed brambles. While these processed amounts represent a tremendous amount ofthese processed amounts represent a tremendous amount of bramble crop outlet, the majority of other bramble acreage is marketed through fresh and pick-your-own outlets.
Strawberries: Values for market outlet were not provided for California.
The remaining producers, representing 53% of strawberry acreage,
market approximately 20% through processed outlets, 40% through
fresh outlets, and 60% through pick-your-own outlets.
Small fruit research was reported by 29 states (Table 6).
Research in cultivar testing and culture were the most common
areas of activity in 24 and 25 states respectively. Insect control,
disease control, weed control, and physiology research was also
reported by a majority of states, and breeding and handling/storage
research was commonly reported. Of the 28 states reporting research
activity, 16 reported an increased effort for the past ten years,
3 reported stable efforts, and 5 reported variable efforts in
different areas. Only three states reported decreases in research
activity.
Of the 36 states responding to the small fruit survey, 33 reported involvement in some form of small fruit production. Only six states predicted a decrease in acreage dedicated to any one crop (blueberries, brambles, or strawberries). Overall, combined acreage of blueberries, brambles, and strawberries is predicted to blueberries, brambles, and strawberries is predicted to increase from 190,519 acres in 1998 to 207,414 acres by 2008, an 8% increase. Research efforts are also increasing for most reporting states.
Acknowledgements.
The authors appreciate the help received in this survey from the
following individuals:
Douglas D. Archbold, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Marvin L. Baker, Texas A&M University, Overton, TX
John Braswell, Mississippi State University, Poplarville, MS
John R. Clark, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
George W. Dickerson, New Mexico State University, Albuquerque,
NM
Mark Ehlenfeldt, USDA-ARS, Chatsworth, NJ
Dick Fuent, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Robert E. Gough, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT
Barbara L. Goulart, Pennsylvania State University, University
Park, PA
David F. Graper, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD
David Handley, University of Maine, Monmouth, ME
Eric J. Hanson, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
David G. Himelrick, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Wayne S. Johnson, University of Nevada, Reno, NV
Michael Kilby, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Gerard Krewer, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA
Kirk D. Larson, University of California, Irvin, CA
Desmond R. Layne, Clemson, University, Clemson, SC
Ken Morera, Driscall Strawberry Associates, Watsonvil
Ken Morera, Driscall Strawberry Associates, Watsonville, CA
Gary C. Pavlis, Rutgers Cooperative Extension Service, Mays Landing,
NJ
Penelope Perkins-Veazie, USDA-ARS, Lane, OK
Marvin P. Pritts, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Earl Puls, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service, Baton Rouge,
LA
Teryl Roper, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Thomas M. Sjulin, Driscall Strawberry Associates, Watsonville,
CA
Herbert D. Stiles - VPI & SU, Blackstone, VA
Bernadine Strik, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
Fumiomi Takeda, USDA-ARS, Kearneyville, WV
Michele Warmund, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
Jeffrey G. Williamson, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
David E. Yarborough, University of Maine, Orono, ME
Galletta, G. J. and D. G. Himelrick. 1990. The small fruit crop, p. 1-13. IN Small Fruit Crop Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Moore, James N.,1994 "The Blueberry Industry of North America",
HortTechnology p. 96-102.
Table 1.1 Blueberry Production in the United States.
| State | ||||||
| 1998 | ||||||
| 1998 | 2008 (est.) | Processed | Fresh | P.Y.O. | ||
| Alabama | 451 | 460 | 10 | 20 | 70 | |
| Arizona | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
| Arkansas | 901 | 950 | 20 | 70 | 10 | |
| California | 50 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | |
| Connecticut | 200 | 200 | 3 | 27 | 70 | |
| Delaware | 75 | 75 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 90 |
| Florida | 1500 | 6000 | 0 | 83 | 17 | |
| Georgia | 4220 | 5500 | 57 | 33 | 10 | |
| Idaho z | 100 | 150 | 0 | 25 | 75 | |
| Illinois z | 200 | 300 | 0 | 60 | 40 | |
| Indiana z | 750 | 750 | 30 | 30 | 40 | |
| Iowa z | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| Kansas z | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Kentucky | 20 | 40 | 0 | 80 | 20 | |
| Louisiana | 603 | 1510 | 10 | 80 | 10 | |
| Maine | 60050 | 60075 | 99 | 1 | 0 | |
| Maryland | 150 | 160 | 0 | 10 | 90 | |
| Massachusetts | 750 | 750 | 5 | 65 | 30 | |
| Michigan | 18000 | 19000 | 65 | 35 | 0 | |
| Minnesota | 100 | 300 | 0 | 20 | 80 | |
| Mississippi | 1510 | 2500 | 50 | 48 | 2 | |
| Missouri | 150 | 150 | 0 | 10 | 90 | |
| Montana | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
| Nevada | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
| New Hampshire | 1300 | 1200 | 70 | 30 | 0 | |
| New Jersey | 8000 | 9000 | 15 | 85 | 85 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
| New York | 1200 | 1400 | 0 | 50 | 50 | |
| North Carolina | 4100 | 5000 | 25 | 70 | 5 | |
| Ohio | 300 | 400 | 10 | 30 | 60 | |
| Oklahoma | 160 | 200 | 0 | 50 | 50 | |
| Oregon | 2302 | 3400 | 65 | 30 | 5 | |
| Pennsylvania | 500 | 600 | 600 | 10 | 30 | 60 |
| Rhode Island | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
| South Carolina | 225 | 450 | 0 | 20 | 80 | |
| South Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tennessee z | 175 | 225 | 0 | 20 | 80 | |
| Texas | 1300 | 1420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vermont | 100 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 75 | |
| Virginia | 215 | 375 | 0 | 10 | 90 | |
| Washington | 1300 | 1700 | 70 | 25 | 5 | |
| West Virginia | <1 | <1 | - | - | - | |
| Wisconsin | 45 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
z Indicates state did not respond. Values are from, and are current
with "The Blueberry Industry on North America," by James
N. Moore, HortTechnology.. April/June 1994
Table 1.2 Present and Projected Blueberry acreage.
| TYPE | 1998 | 2008 | CHANGE | ||
| N. Highbush | 39985 | 43931 | + 3946 | + 9 % | |
| S. Highbush | 1316 | 6562 | + 5246 | +398 % | |
| Rabbiteye | 9460 | 13546 | + 4086 | + 43 % | |
| Lowbush (wild) | 60000 | 60000 | 0 | 0 | |
| Other | 30 | 40 | + 10 | + 33 % | |
| Total CultivatedZ | 51016 | 64529 | + 13513 | + 26 % | |
| TotalZ | 111016 | 124529 | + 13513 | + 12 % |
Z Includes valTR>
Z Includes values from S. Carolina (no type specified).
Includes acreage from surveys not specifying type of blueberry.
96% of acreage reported were of specified type.
Table. 2.1 Bramble Production in the United States.
| State | ||||||
| Alabama | 250 | 250 | 0 | 10 | 90 | |
| Arizona | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 80 | |
| Arkansas | 180 | 560 | 0 | 50 | 50 | |
| Georgia | 50 | 75 | 0 | 5 | 95 | |
| Kentucky | 175 | 235 | 3 | 9 | 88 | |
| Louisiana | 100 | 150 | 0 | 10 | 90 | |
| Maine | 100 | 120 | 22 | 51 | 27 | |
| Michigan | 750 | 850 | 10 | 60 | 30 | |
| Minnesota | 400 | 400 | 0 | 10 | 90 | |
| Mississippi | 60 | 60 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 10 |
| Missouri | 700 | 800 | 8 | 10 | 88 | |
| New Jersey | 82 | 92 | - | - | - | |
| New Mexico | 38 | 38 | 9 | 82 | 9 | |
| New York | 950 | 850 | 2 | 43 | 55 | |
| North Carolina | 200 | 250 | 0 | 5 | 95 | |
| Ohio | 710 | 1205 | 7 | 12 | 81 | |
| Oklahoma | 93 | 93 | 93 | 0 | 52 | 48 |
| Oregon | 11640 | 12210 | 94 | 6 | 0 | |
| Pennsylvania | 620 | 630 | 17 | 22 | 61 | |
| South Carolina | 125 | 350 | 0 | 25 | 75 | |
| South Dakota | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 80 | |
| Texas | 514 | 636 | 16 | 19 | 64 | |
| Virginia | <1 | <1 | - | - | - | |
| Washington | 8635 | 8660 | 94 | 5 | 1 | |
| West Virginia | <1 | <1 | - | - | - | |
| Wisconsin | 150 | 150 | 0 | 37 | 63 | |
Table 2.2 Present and Projected Bramble acreage.
| TYPE | 1998 | 2008 | CHANGE | |||
| Blackberry | ||||||
| Erect-Thorny | 1354 | 1127 | - 227 | - 16 % | ||
| Erect-Thornless | 878 | 878 | 1760 | + 882 | +100 % | |
| Semi-Erect | 199 | 307 | + 108 | + 72 % | ||
| Trailing | 7025 | 7650 | + 625 | + 8 % | ||
| Total Z | 9566 | 11094 | +1 388 | + 14 % | ||
| Raspberry | ||||||
| Red-Spring | 13128 | 12833 | - 295 | - 2 % | ||
| Red-Fall | 2310 | 2723 | + 413 | + 17 % | ||
| Purple & Black | 1523 | 1928 | 1928 | + 405 | + 26 % | |
| Other: Yellow | 2 | 10 | + 8 | + 400 % | ||
| Total Z | 16963 | 17509 | + 604 | + 3 % | ||
| Total Z | 26544 | 28688 | +1719 | + 6 % |
Z Indicates values from S. Carolina (no type specified)
Table 3.1 Strawberry Production in the United States
| State | |||||||
| Arizona | 25 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Arkansas | 250 | 500 | 0 | 60 | 40 | ||
| California | 24163 | 24163 | - | - | - | ||
| Florida | 6000 | 6000 | 0 | 90 | 10 | ||
| Georgia | 100 | 150 | 0 | 5 | 95 | ||
| Kentucky | 490 | 560 | 0 | 10 | 90 | ||
| Louisiana | 800 | 600 | 600 | 0 | 90 | 10 | |
| Maine | 354 | 404 | 5 | 15 | 80 | ||
| Michigan | 1820 | 2020 | 10 | 40 | 50 | ||
| Minnesota | 1000 | 800 | 0 | 30 | 70 | ||
| Mississippi | 30 | 35 | 0 | 80 | 20 | ||
| Missouri | 1000 | 850 | 0 | 20 | 80 | ||
| New Jersey | 150 | 150 | - | - | - | ||
| New York | |||||||
| New York | 3030 | 3030 | 0 | 50 | 50 | ||
| North Carolina | 3000 | 4000 | 0 | 25 | 75 | ||
| Ohio | 1105 | 1260 | 10 | 30 | 60 | ||
| Oklahoma | 100 | 130 | 0 | 50 | 50 | ||
| Oregon | 4400 | 3800 | 90 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Pennsylvania | 1525 | 1725 | 10 | 20 | 70 | ||
| South Carolina | 350 | 950 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 80 | |
| South Dakota | 45 | 55 | 9 | 11 | 80 | ||
| Texas | 21 | 30 | 0 | 57 | 43 | ||
| Washington | 1600 | 1650 | 73 | 15 | 12 | ||
| West Virginia | <1 | ||||||
| Wisconsin | 1100 | 800 | 0 | 20 | 80 | ||
Table 3.2 Present and Projected Strawberry acreage.
| TYPE | 1998 | 2008 | 2008 | CHANGE | |
| June bearing | 43348 | 43931 | + 583 | + 1 % | |
| Day neutral | 8199 | 8167 | - 42 | - 0 % | |
| Ever bearing | 1052 | 1149 | + 97 | + 9 % | |
| Total Z | 52959 | 541977 | +1238 | + 2 % |
Z Includes values from S. Carolina (no type specified)
Table 4. Other Small Fruit Crops
| Fruit | |||||||
| Fruit | State | 1998 | 2008 | ||||
| Cranberries | Maine | 120 | 2000 | 95 | 5 | 0 | |
| Massachusetts | 14600 | - | - | - | - | ||
| New Jersey | 3700 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Oregon | 2000 | 3000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Washington | 1500 | 1800 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Wisconsin | 15000 | 20000 | 98 | 2 | 0 | ||
| Figs | South Carolina | 35 | 75 | 10 | 20 | 70 | |
| Gooseberry/ Current | Oregon | 10 | - | - | - | - | |
| Kiwi | South Carolina | 65 | 65 | 0 | 85 | 15 | |
| Oregon | 65 | - | - | - | - | ||
| Lingenberry | Oregon | 4 | - | - | - | - | |
| Mayhaw | South Carolina | 5 | 25 | 100 | - | - | |
Table 5. Small fruit market outlet estimates
| Fruit | Processed | Fresh | Pick-Your-Own |
| Pick-Your-Own | |||
| Blueberry | 70% | 25% | 5% |
| Bramble | 55% | 35% | 10% |
| Strawberryz | 20% | 40% | 60% |
zExcludes values from California.
Table 6. Small fruit research activities in the United States.
| State | Control | Control | Control |
Storage | Research Status | ||||||||
| AL | X | Increased | |||||||||||
| AK | Decreased | ||||||||||||
| CA | Increased* | ||||||||||||
| FL | Increased | ||||||||||||
| GA | Variable | ||||||||||||
| KY | Increased | ||||||||||||
| LA | Increased | ||||||||||||
| ME | Stable | ||||||||||||
| MD | > | Variable | |||||||||||
| MA | Increased | ||||||||||||
| MI | Stable | ||||||||||||
| MN | Increased | ||||||||||||
| MS | Increased | ||||||||||||
| MO | Variable | ||||||||||||
| MT | New | ||||||||||||
| NC | Decreased | ||||||||||||
| NH | Stable | ||||||||||||
| NJ | Increased | ||||||||||||
| NY | Increased | ||||||||||||
| OH | Increased | ||||||||||||
| OK | Decreased | ||||||||||||
| OR | | OR | Increased | | ||||||||||
| PA | Variable | ||||||||||||
| SD | Increased | ||||||||||||
| TX | Variable | ||||||||||||
| VA | Increased | ||||||||||||
| WA | Increased | ||||||||||||
| WV | Increased | ||||||||||||
| WI | No Data |
* Increased experienced in private sector, but decreased in public
sector.