World Conference on Horticultural Research - 17-20 June 1998 in Rome, Italy
WCHR Home   WCHR 1   WCHR 2   WCHR 3   WCHR 4   WCHR 5   Search  

NEEDS AND EXPECTATIONS OF THE HORTICULTURE-RELATED INDUSTRY

Henry A. RoRE-RELATED INDUSTRY

Henry A. Robitaille
Walt Disney World Co.
P.O. Box 10,000
Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA 32830-1000


Introduction

The WG3 document includes a Worldwide Summary Report followed by seven presentations. The Worldwide Summary Report is the product of horticultural specialists who were solicited and requested expressly to address the needs and expectations for horticultural research in their region, country, organization, or industry. In some cases they directly represented a single stakeholder's perspective, e.g., Produce Marketing Association (PMA). In other cases the specialists felt confident in representing all stakeholders: consumers, producers, marketing companies and associations, and public research organizations (government and university laboratories). Like Dr. Roger Lawson, who is the horticultural project leader for the United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service (USDA/ARS), stated: "Our research results must be relevant to customers and all other users."

Because the technological needs of developing countries are markedly different from those that drive markets in industrialized countries and because national horticultural research programs are invariably weak or non-existent in many of the developing countries, the Worldwide Summary Report divides the world into three categories by level of economic development.o three categories by level of economic development. The "Developed Economies" section is summarized from inputs received from the USA-USDA/ARS, North Carolina State University, Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission, Spain (Greenhouse Vegetable Industry), Israel, CAB International, PMA, and several individual horticultural leaders. The "Emerging Economies" section is represented by South Korea, Indonesia, and Hungary--one of the Eastern European countries that is, in a way, beginning anew horticulturally. Speaking for the "Low Income Economies" are three CGIAR (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) Centers: CIP (International Potato Center), IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), and AVRDC (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center), as well as a senior officer of the FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations).

Many contributors expressed needs that do not require research; for example, the North Carolina nursery industry has a long wish list, but not one item requires research to implement. This report is specifically limited to research needs and expectations.

The Chair's summaries of contributors' oral and written reports (Contributor Summary Reports) are included following the Worldwide Summary Report. The complete, unedited reports of those contributors who responded in writing are on the Congress web site at: <ht writing are on the Congress web site at: <http://wchr.agrsci.unibo.it/wc3/indexwc3.html>. You are strongly encouraged to study both the Contributor Summary Reports and their full reports on the web site. Information on how to contact all contributors is listed at the end of the WG3 document.

The eight presentations begin with Drs. Michelangelo Leis and Alessio Martinelli who review the plant propagation industry needs in our host country, Italy. Dr. Nicky Seager (kiwifruit) and Drs. Kirby Moulton and John Possingham (viticulture) look at the WG3 mission from single crop perspectives. Dr. Henk Van Oosten gives us a single country's perspective. Note that that country is Holland, a horticultural leader, and number one worldwide in floriculture production (1). Country presentations are also provided by Drs. Amnon Erez and I. Spharim, Israel; K.L. Chadha, India; and Sue Popple, United Kingdom--three countries with a keen interest in horticulture's research needs and expectations. Dr. John Abbott, NOVARTIS Corporation, looks at the needs and expectations for horticultural research from the viewpoint of the large, multinational corporations. His report addresses the missions of both WG3 and WG4 (horticultural policy). Many of these large multinationals are, or were, the large chemical companies. Others are seed and/or biotechnology companies with their future staked to crop improvement. All are business driven and have little nee All are business driven and have little need for the public sector except as a source of new talent. They do, however, have the resources to accomplish big breakthrough projects from beginning to end. For certain, these companies will have much to do with determining our horticultural futures.



WORLDWIDE SUMMARY REPORT

Developed Economies

Many of today's horticultural research needs have been with us a long time. Yields per land area must continue to increase as the world's population redoubles in the next few decades. Strong research programs that develop and apply precision agricultural technologies and that better adapt crops to their production environments will be essential if these productivity increases are to occur without worsening the environmental impact of farming. Ancient pest problems remain; and their solutions are important needs, e.g., Tristeza in citrus and Late Blight of potato. A frequent request is for the application of new tools and technologies like bio-engineering and marker assisted (fast track) breeding to help with these continuing needs. Other needs are specific to regions and/or crops and cannot be easily summarized. For the United States, the Agricultural Research Service lists "increasing the competitiveness of small farm agriculture" as one of its major needs. The tree fruit industry would like to have size controlling rootst industry would like to have size controlling rootstocks. These specific needs are as numerous as are individual horticultural crops and regions, and many examples can be seen in the following Contributor Summary Reports and full reports on the web. You are encouraged to use these authors as contacts for further information and dialogue. Interesting trends are surfacing; needs that are mentioned in almost every report. Some of them are new in terms of the high degree of emphasis they receive. Most of them are consumer driven demonstrating that when public interest grows to a critical level, it begins to reverberate throughout all segments of the industry. Consumer demands largely determine what growers, market operators, shippers, and the entire horticultural chain consider important priorities. As in any other business sector, their own needs are secondary to what their markets demand.

Four major trend areas are:

1. The Environment

In her Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting of the American Association (AAAS) for the Advancement of Science, Jane Lubchenco (5) states that the environment is no longer a marginal issue, but is the issue of the future. She calls for an investment in both fundamental and applied research in a broad spectrum of areas where new knowledge is urgently needed: "The new and unmet needs of society include more comprehensive information, understanding, anore comprehensive information, understanding, and technologies for society to move toward a more sustainable biosphere--one that is ecologically sound, economically feasible, and socially just."

Only a decade ago those who espoused sustainable horticulture were dismissed by the scientific community almost as "crackpots." When we opened The Land Pavilion at Epcot® in 1982, we displayed horticultural crops, concepts, tools, and technologies important to horticulture but with no environmental theme. Today, sustainable practices in horticultural production are the predominant messages at The Land. Reducing the environmental impact of horticultural production is also the top expectation listed in almost every contribution to this worldwide report. Some of the specific needs listed include: cultural practices that minimize the environmental impact of production; broader application of integrated pest management; nutrient management systems, including precision agriculture technologies for reducing the introduction of excess nitrogen, phosphorus, pesticides, and other pollutants into the environment; irrigation re-circulation and zero runoff strategies for greenhouse and hydroponic growers; and plant-based biodegradable plastic mulches and greenhouse covers. There are even calls for research in direct support of organic horticulture. Sales of organic produce have been increasing at a rate of 20 to 30e have been increasing at a rate of 20 to 30 percent annually in North America for the past five years (Coleman).

2. Food Safety

Not surprisingly, research to guarantee safe fruits and vegetables is the number one need cited by marketing organizations. They want to determine how and where pathogens get on food and how best to remove them. They also want research to develop quick tests for unsafe produce. Both European and American government spokespersons cite food safety as high priority and pledge research to increase the level of scientific knowledge of microorganisms that cause food safety problems. Countries interested in international trade want to be able to guarantee clean horticultural products free from both human, animal, and plant pathogens and pests. The ability to deliver pesticide free or low residue horticultural products is also a frequently cited need related to both food safety and environmental issues.

3. Product Quality

A frequently stated consumer-driven expectation is safe, high quality foods. In pursuit of this goal, producers and distributors need longer produce shelf lives, achievable either via development of new cultivars or improvements in post harvest handling and storage technology. Others cite the need for non-destructive measurement techniques for predicting and measuring product maturity and quality. Pineapple is an example of a superior produclity. Pineapple is an example of a superior product nevertheless shunned by many consumers because of prior unfavorable experiences with immature fruit that should never have been in the market. Market operators support research to improve consistency in quality, to develop new products, or make superior products more marketable. They support research projects such as those currently underway to develop a pre-peeled citrus product and to delay the softening of tree fully ripened stone fruits.

4. New Product Development

The continued ongoing development of new, improved cultivars with pest resistance, longer storage life, enhanced aroma and flavor, etc. is a widely stated need and expectation for future horticultural research. In addition, there is strong support for development of new crops and products for different purposes:

  1. New plant sources of raw materials for industry and energy.
  2. New food products developed through a basic understanding of food composition, flavor, texture and packaging, including value added through new or alternative processing procedures.
  3. Fruits and vegetables with higher levels of both nutritional and functional components that improve health and well-being, and even prevent, treat, and manage chronic diseases (8). This research will require collaboration between horticultural and medical scientists.
  4. New and superior ornamental medical scientists.
  5. New and superior ornamental crops (e.g., Christmas tree growers need new selections with desirable traits).
  6. Systematic exploitation of the enormous biodiversity of tropical plants in an internationally cooperative way.
  7. New, high-value crops for diversification.
  8. An effective substitute(s) for methyl bromide.

A number of additional research needs and expectations, falling outside these four major trend areas, are frequently mentioned and are important to summarize:

  1. Reduce production costs via improved management and engineering (lower the cost of production). Apply flexible and appropriate technologies to each situation.
  2. Build public support for biotechnology (especially in Europe).
  3. Improve weather forecasting to increase reliability of production.
  4. Increase rates of technology transfer to horticulture (e.g., new remote sensing technologies for plant stress detection).
  5. Find ways for low income economies to share in the new wealth being created via biotechnology.
  6. Cooperate more effectively in horticultural research efforts. Since large companies don't see sufficient markets in minor crops, research will have to continue in the less well-funded public sector.
  7. Mechanization, especially for harvests.



Emerging Economies

The three countries reporting are all committed to continued development of their horticultug are all committed to continued development of their horticultural industries and to continuing a transition from subsistence crops to high value horticultural crops. They place strong emphasis on improving product quality and the economic status of their producers. Their research needs vary little from those of the more advanced economies. References to developing sustainable practices, including precise fertilizer application and integrated pest management with emphasis on biological insect pest control, are common. They plan to develop new ornamental cultivars; improve mechanization of harvests; breed for pest and stress resistance; produce clean, safe products for export; preserve native species; and sustainably exploit their unique resources. They also stress the need for development of effective domestic and international research partnerships.

Low Income Economies

Some of the needs and expectations for horticultural research in poorer countries are different and unique; while others are the same as those listed for the previous groups, such as the need to develop sustainable production methods and effective research partnerships. The following is a list of horticultural research needs for low income economies:

  1. Develop and apply sustainable production methods. This is especially important in developing countries where poverty, low agricultural productivity, and environmental degradation are inseparable. Norm Borlaug ental degradation are inseparable. Norm Borlaug (2) states that "The root cause of most environmental degradation has been mistaken economic policy in many parts of the developing world, which perpetuates low-yielding traditional farming systems and poverty by not aggressively bringing science-based technology to small-scale farmers." As an example, global application of fertilization nitrogen (N) is increasing rapidly from 32 million metric tons (32 TgN) in 1970 to a projected 130 to 150 TgN in 2050, with two-thirds of that application in developing countries (3). Consequences include nitrate runoff into water systems and nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) to the atmosphere. N2O is a significant greenhouse gas (7), and NO regulates tropospheric ozone production and is a precursor to acid precipitation (4). Matson, et al (6), through some creative research in Mexico, recently showed that lower rates of N fertilizer, applied later in a crop cycle, reduced N loss without affecting yield and product quality. They conclude that a knowledge-intensive approach to fertilizer management can substitute for higher levels of inputs, saving farmers money and reducing environmental costs.
  2. Extend the green revolution to horticultural crops in order to balance nutritional quality with quantity. The revolution actually displaced pulses and vegetables with the high yielding grains to the nutritional detriment of th grains to the nutritional detriment of the people.
  3. Address an alarming human micro-nutrient malnutrition problem by breeding digestible micro-nutrients, especially iron, zinc, and vitamin K into vegetables and fruits.
  4. Consider the entire seed to market chain in planning research projects. Research to increase production, or product quality alone, usually fails because storage, shipping, markets, etc. have not been planned.
  5. Continue to emphasize pest and disease management because this research has, historically, shown a high rate of return.
  6. Identify, characterize, and preserve genetic resources. Perfect low cost, reliable, storage methods for vegetatively propagated germplasm. A related social (policy) issue is to find just solutions to intellectual property and natural resource ownership issues so everyone benefits.
  7. Sustainably exploit under utilized native species. For example, Indonesia has made it a high national priority to fund the research necessary to develop a native tropical fruits industry and to protect their native orchids that are being lost to deforestation and theft.
  8. Strengthen horticultural research capacity so native scientists can generate new knowledge for increasing productivity with particular emphasis on sustainability and prudent use of inputs (water, fertilizer, pesticides, etc.). One special area of need is infrastructure and training in information technology and service.
  9. Fing in information technology and service.
  10. Food safety-related research is very important if export markets are a future goal.
  11. Collaborative research and the development of effective research partnerships are considered extremely important for these low income economies.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Bordelon, Bruce, et al. 1997. Food System 21: Gearing up for the New Millennium. Chapter 13: Horticultural Sector. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, West Lafayette, IN.
  2. Borlaug, Norman E. 1997. "Feeding the World in the 21st Century: The Challenges Before Us." Keynote address, presented at the World Congress of the International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  3. FAO, Fertilizer Yearbook, United Nations, 1990; United Nations, United Nations Statistical Yearbook, International Economic and Social Affairs Department, 1992; Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems" (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report, Washington, DC, 1990; Bumb, B.L. and Baanante, C.A., "The Role of Fertilizer in Sustaining Food Security and Protecting the Environment to 2020" (International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 1996).
  4. Hall, S.J., et al. 1996. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. P. 21, 311; Veldkamp, E., et al. 1997. "Nutrient Cycling A311; Veldkamp, E., et al. 1997. "Nutrient Cycling Agroecosyst" P. 48, 69; Davidson, E.A., et al, ibid., P. 37.
  5. Lubchenco, Jane. 1998. "Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science." Science 279: P. 491-497.
  6. Matson, Pamela A. et al. 1998. Integration of Environmental, Agronomic, and Economic Aspects of Fertilizer Management. Science 280: P. 112-115.
  7. Mosier, A.R. 1994. Fert. Res. P. 37, 191; Bouwman, A.F. 1994. "Direct Emission of Nitrous Oxide from Agricultural Soils" (Report No. 773004004. National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, the Netherlands); Williams, E. J., et al. 1992. "Global Biogeochem," Cycles P. 6, 351; Eichner, M.J. 1990. J. Environ, Qual. P. 19, 272.
  8. Unnevehr. Laurian, et al. 1998. Regulating Health Claims on Food Products. Choices (American Agricultural Economics Association) First Quarter: P. 26-31.


CONTRIBUTOR SUMMARY REPORTS

Contributors' full reports appear on the Congress website at:
<http://wchr.agrsci.unibo.it/wc3/indexwc3.html>.

1. DEVELOPED ECONOMIES

1.1. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE/AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE (USDA/ARS)

Excerpted from a personal interview with Dr. Roger H. Lawson, National Program Leader, Horticulture and Sugar Crops, National Program rogram Leader, Horticulture and Sugar Crops, National Program Staff, Agricultural Research Service, in Beltsville, MD, USA in November 1997.

In a subsequent conversation, Dr. Lawson expanded on this list with the following research priorities:

1.2.5. Vegetable Industry

1.2.6. Small Fruit Industries

Strawberries

1.6. CAB INTERNATIONAL

Summarized from a statement titled: "Needs and Expectations for Horticultural Research: Some Major Issues" by R. J. Williams.

R. J. Williams suggests two major research needs: (1) effective substitution of biological for chemical pest management and (2) crop improvements made possible today by breakthroughs in biotechnology. These needs are largely driven by consumer demands for high quality products produced with minimal environmental impacts. Applications must extend to developing countries where the most severe environmental impact problems occur. In the developed countries, particularly Europe, we must find ways of building public understanding of, and support for, biotechnology.

1.7. PRODUCE MARKETING ASSOCIATION (PMA)

Summarized from notes of telephone conversations with Kathy Means (PMA) and Ed McLaughlin, Cornell University.

The market operators' perspective was provided by Kathy Means Communications Director, PMA, and Ed McLaughlin, Professor of Marketing at Cornell University. Professor McLaughlin does research on retail marketing of produce. Both experts listed food safety as the most critical issue requiring research to determine how and where pathogens get on food and how best to remove them. The second priority was improved product quality; produce that tastes good and is highly convenient and, therefore, easstes good and is highly convenient and, therefore, easy to market. This requires not only crop improvement research, but also the development of new technologies like smart films and modified atmosphere storage. Market operators know that more and more consumers want convenient, safe, and tasty foods with shelf life; horticultural products don't work yet as well as, for example, pizza. New ideas like pre-peeled citrus and controlled ripening are good approaches. Both experts suggested that we need a better understanding of the $80 billion distribution system between grower and retailer. Too much temperature abuse during that period affects quality and safety. The PMA spokesperson also called for research to: (1) develop quick tests for unsafe produce; (2) develop novel new products, e.g., gold kiwifruit, or make superior products more marketable, e.g., mango; (3) improve consistency in quality, e.g., many consumers don't buy pineapple because they've had a bad quality experience; and (4) strengthen the scientific link between horticultural products and health. Especially important will be studies on complex interrelations that suggest that nutrients in foods cannot be replaced with pills.

1.8. Personal Views

1.8.1.Robert Coleman

Summarized from a report entitled: "Horticultural Research Needed Worldwide" by R. Coleman, horticulture public relations specialist, Coleman Communications.

Prio specialist, Coleman Communications.

Priority areas:

  1. Horticultural research must be aimed at feeding many more millions each year worldwide with:
    - Field studies directed to increasing per unit (ac/hectare) production of the most basic vegetables and fruits.
    - Greenhouse studies aimed at increasing in-house (under plastic/glass) production.
  2. Adapt and perfect precision agriculture technologies within horticulture. Trial efforts in vegetable and citrus production are now underway, but much remains to be done regarding the improvement of inputs. GPS and GIS systems, plus integrated GPS/GIS systems and studies, are needed into Variable Rate Technology for ways to reduce fertilizer and chemical applications and still control insect, disease, and weed problems, yet reduce drift, cut costs, and sustain or improve the environment.
  3. Increase horticultural research activities to deal with consumers' top concerns. A 1995 consumer poll found that the five most important horticulturally related issues with the public were, in order: water contamination, bacterial food contamination, pesticide residues, food additives (including irradiation), and soil erosion.

More aggressively pursue research into organic vegetable and fruit production--especially in lieu of greater demands for organic foods. In the United States notes The Packer, a fresh produce trade newspaper, sales of organic produce have ce trade newspaper, sales of organic produce have been increasing 20 to 30 percent per year for the past five years with similar growth forecast for the next several years.

Finally, the trend to greater yearly production of greenhouse-grown tomatoes and certain other in-demand vegetables presents opportunities for researchers to increase efficiencies, reduce environmental impacts of production, introduce new products, etc.

1.8.2. Merle Jensen

Summarized from notes of a telephone conversation with Dr. Merle Jensen, horticulturist and assistant dean for Agriculture, University of Arizona.

(Note: Dr. Jensen has traveled and consulted extensively throughout the world and is a horticultural liaison between industry and the University of Arizona.)

1.8.2.1. General Situation

Almost all universities are not meeting industry needs. The greenhouse industry is running out of skilled technicians. The education process is remiss in not teaching students how to apply their knowledge so they can enter industry with confidence following graduation.

In research there is a widening gap between the scientists and the application of their work in the field. Horticultural scientists relate less and less to their industry. Most make little or no attempt to communicate their science to the public.

Research in the corporate sector is business driven and backed by big money. The corate sector is business driven and backed by big money. The corporate sector does not necessarily need the universities except to hire away their best scientists. The public sector does not have the necessary resources to do the big break-through projects from beginning to end.

Horticultural scientists must learn to be entrepreneurs. There is little money available for horticultural research, so scientists must be imaginative and creative. For example, in Arizona Merle is building a center for controlled environment agriculture. It is making a difference. Controlled environment agriculture versus the traditional crop, cotton, produces 37¢ versus 0.1¢ worth of product for every gallon of irrigation water applied. In addition, controlled environment agriculture produces 500 jobs for every 100 acres. (Ed. note: Arizona is a desert, and irrigation water is a very valuable commodity.)

1.8.2.2. Controlled Environment Agriculture

Horticulture is becoming more sophisticated and high tech as a result of research successes in crop breeding, crop nutrition, pollination, integrated pest management, and greenhouse engineering. In the last 35 years greenhouse vegetable yields have increased from 50 to 250 tons per acre, with parallel increases in product quality.

One of the biggest needs today is for biodegradable plastics, preferably plant-based biodegradable plastics. Today in the world there are 8.5 million acres c. Today in the world there are 8.5 million acres covered with plastic mulch and 650 thousand acres of plastic covered greenhouses. The disposed problem for used plastic is huge.

1.8.2.3. Other Needs and Expectations.
  1. The number one research priority will involve solving environmental issues.
  2. Feeding future world populations will involve applying appropriate technologies to individual situations. The education process should prepare students for this.
  3. Genetic control and manipulation (biotechnology) will be powerful, and we are challenged to find ways of enabling the developing economies to share in that new "wealth."
  4. Refine human nutrition and link it closely to (preventive) medicine.
  5. Look at possibilities for transfer of technologies in other fields to horticulture, e.g., U.S. National Laboratory technologies. How can the horticultural industry make money via application of new, available technologies?
  6. Improvements in weather forecasting and increasing the reliability of production.

1.8.3. J. Weerts

Summarized from a statement titled: "Personal Views Concerning the Future Needs for Horticultural Research" by J. Weerts.

J. Weerts of Belgium agrees that large companies will mostly continue to have little interest in horticultural research. Therefore, he suggests that horticulture should maximize research progress via major internatiulture should maximize research progress via major international collaboration efforts. The two major research priorities that Weerts sees dominating in Europe are: (1) health, notably food safety, the intrinsic quality of horticultural products and designations of origin, and (2) cultural practices that minimize the environmental impact of production. He also suggests collaboration between horticultural and medical scientists, the development of new uses and new markets in both the food and non-food sector, including medicinal uses and new horticultural product based convenience foods. Finally, he suggests a systematic exploitation of the enormous biodiversity of tropical plants, obviously for their potential, but also as one way to build international cooperation in horticultural research and help build the economy of developing countries.


2. EMERGING ECONOMIES

2.1. HUNGARY

(Excerpted from several reports by Dr. Pál Sass; all available on the www site: Agenda for Research and Development Activities for the Next Decades in Hungarian Horticulture; Main Elements and Targets of the Research and Development in the Hungarian Canning Industry; Part-Report on Hungarian Horticultural Research)

Hungary has for decades stressed mass production over quality and, therefore, has much research to do upgrading technology before it can compete in the world market. Their research agenda stresses application ofket. Their research agenda stresses application of foreign technology when it is available; building cultivar information data bases based on foreign cultivars; trials and breeding; application of information systems (information technology, computer controls and modeling) for total quality management; quality improvement; sustainability in production, including environmental protection, biological pest control, energy conservation, and environment friendly field packaging; and research to support post harvest handling, processing, and storage. This includes research priorities like "determination of optional harvest dates for maximum storage life and the role of processed horticultural products in human nutrition."

A document entitled: "Report on Hungarian Horticultural Research" reviews research priorities in depth. It stresses sustainable development and environmental protection; integrated production, including IPM; development of energy saving technologies, including geo thermal; development of disease resistant rootstocks and varieties; search for new beneficial genes; and development of an industry in medicinal and aromatic plants for industrial and pharmaceutical uses. The document specifies that the crop breeding effort will exploit new technologies like molecular markers and genetic engineering. Production and handling research will involve studies in many different areas, including post harvest physiologrent areas, including post harvest physiology and application of information technologies. Storage will be an area of research emphasis that will include both product physiological studies and new engineering developments. One area of particular emphasis is food safety in relation to food processing.

2.2. INDONESIA

(Excerpted from a personal interview with Dr. Livy Winata Gunawan and from a report "Business Prospects for Tropical Fruits in Indonesia" by Dr. Syafrida Manuwoto, which is published on the www site)

Until recently there was very little horticulture research as the government concentrated on rice. However, the present and future agricultural research emphasis will be on the development of a native tropical fruits industry. Research goals will be to improve the economy of small growers, improve the nutritional status of rural populations, achieve agricultural sustainability, preserve indigenous species, preserve and evaluate germplasm, breed new cultivars, develop effective and efficient propagation methods, and develop harvest and post-harvest handling and processing methods. The goal is to exploit both conventional and new technologies and form both domestic and international working research partnerships.

Vegetable research will concentrate on potato, hot peppers, and garlic. Priorities include breeding for disease resistance and heat tolerant cultivars. An ornamsease resistance and heat tolerant cultivars. An ornamentals priority is the preservation of native orchids, many of which are lost to timbering and theft.

2.3. SOUTH KOREA

(Excerpted from a document provided by Dr. K.W. Park entitled "Future Needs and Expectations for Horticultural Research in Korea." The entire document is published on the www site.)

Korea is a modern horticultural success story. Between 1985 and 1995, production of field vegetables, greenhouse vegetables, fruits, cut flowers, and mushrooms increased by 15, 257, 67, 904, and 464 percent, respectively. Future research needs and expectations of the Korean horticultural industry as a whole are listed as:

Vegetable producers are specifically looking for increased mechanization of sowing and harvesting, more automation in protected culture, and finding wng and harvesting, more automation in protected culture, and finding ways to deliver increased freshness and quality to consumers. Fruit growers cited a need for research to increase productivity through breeding, introduction of new cultivars, or new production methods, and reductions in production labor costs. The flower growers' research wish list includes development of new crops from native flowering plants, breeding for pest and environmental stress resistance, and more application of computers in production and marketing. Hydroponic growers need better adapted cultivars, effective disinfecting methods, better definition of crop fertilizer requirements, materials recycling systems, and better methods of getting product to market. Ed. Note: These are basically the research needs of hydroponic growers the world over.

Marketing groups listed better packaging and storage technologies and high quality product free of any safety concerns as their highest priorities. University scientists plan to concentrate their research on plant nutrition to support the growing hydroponics industry, applications of biotechnology to breeding for improved product quality, post harvest physiology to support horticultural exports, and reducing environmental impacts of horticulture.


3. LOW INCOME ECONOMIES

3.1. ASIAN VEGETABLE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER (AVRDC)

(Excerpted from a written statement by Dr. Samson Tsou, Directed from a written statement by Dr. Samson Tsou, Director General, AVRDC. Read Dr. Tsou's statement in its entirety on the WWW site.)

Research Needs and Expectations:

  1. Double vegetable production while using less land, water, fertilizers and pesticides.
  2. Incorporate nutritional objectives into production systems to address alarming micro nutrient malnutrition.
  3. Enhance the nutritional well-being and raise the incomes of poor people in the rural and urban areas of developing countries through improved methods of vegetable production, marketing, and distribution while taking into account the need to preserve the quality of the environment.

To meet these needs, the near-term objectives are:

The following statement by Dr. Tsou is very important because it addresses interactions that must occur between consumers, growers, public and private research organizations, and markets:

 "AVRDC's success i
 "AVRDC's success is heavily dependent on collaborative relationship among a wide range of institutions, including other international agricultural research centers (IARC), regional agencies, and advanced research laboratories. We see the comparative advantage, the mutual complementarities, and the strength of industry-based research and believe that in the years to come a better division of labor between IARC and NARS, including the public sector and private sector, especially indigenous local industries, is in the interest of us all. Our partnerships with NARS involve participatory approaches in the identification of major production constraints, breeding and selection, design of production systems or resistant management strategies, and human resources development.

The applications of technologies developed, however, will be heavily dependent on the commitment of respective governments for strengthening the infrastructure and regulations which will serve as the base for a vegetable industry.

As an R&D organization, we cannot ignore the need for input from the private sector. Forging the AVRDC and private sector partnership would promote the most effective use of limited resources for the development of indigenous agri-food industries and to assist the developing world to strengthen the needed service industries for vegetable production, handling, and marketing. However, there are certain policy issues needed to be ironed ouroned out so as to optimize the partnership. There is a worldwide drive to strengthen the intellectual property rights (IPR) over improved materials and cutting-edge technologies, as well as the non-IPR over genetic resources. They are in fact forcing a restructuring of the relations between the private sector, the public sector, and IARC. The ability of negotiating and protecting IPR to ensure that NARS in the developing world have access to improved plant materials and cutting-edge technologies might be necessary."

 


3.2. FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO)

(Excerpts from contributions by Dr. N. Murthi Anishetty, Senior Officer, Plant Genetics Resources Group.)

Dr. Anishetty listed three research needs which apply to developed, as well as developing, countries:

  1. Development and commercialization of under-utilized species, together with sustainable management practices, and appropriate post harvest processing and methods for improving market opportunities.
  2. Perfection of low-cost and reliable techniques for long-term conservation of vegetatively propagated species, and
  3. Development of methods for surveying and assessing the intra- and infra-specific diversity of horticultural crops. This information is important for building public support for strengthening national research support for strengthening national research programs and preserving biological diversity.

3.3. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE (IFPRI)

(Excerpted from an interview with Dr. Per Pinstrup-Andersen, Director General, and Dr. Nurul Islam, Research Fellow Emeritus.)

With a research mission geared to the specific objective of reducing hunger and malnutrition, IFPRI sees the following as the most important needs and expectations for horticultural research.

  1. Breeding digestible micro nutrients especially iron, zinc, and vitamin K into vegetables and fruits.
  2. The green revolution must be extended to pulses, horticultural crops, and other crops that were displaced by the high yielding grains. This is to bring nutritional quality back into balance with quantity.
  3. Consideration of the whole seed to market chain in planning research projects. In the past research leading to improved production has, in reality, often failed because end product storage, shipping, marketing, etc. were not considered. Growers the world over are entrepreneurs and will grow the business if the entire chain is in place. Provide markets.
  4. Phytosanitary issues are big especially if the markets are export. Research is needed to understand food contamination, and quick tests and efficacious decontamination methods must be developed to ease export restrictions.
  5. Social scientists must research act restrictions.
  6. Social scientists must research acceptable solutions to intellectual property rights issues so that research progress is not impeded while farmers and countries of origin are justly compensated.
  7. Development and application of sustainable production methods will probably be most important in developing countries where issues of poverty, low agricultural productivity, and natural resource degradation are inseparable.

3.4. INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER (CIP)

(Excerpted from the CIP Medium-Term Plan 1998-2000; the strategic overview chapter of the plan is on the www site.)

The CIP has done an excellent job of prioritizing the needs and expectations for research on potato and sweetpotato:

  1. Integrated Control of Potato Late Blight
  2. Integrated Control of Bacterial Wilt
  3. Control of Potato Viruses
  4. Integrated Management of Potato Pests
  5. Propagation of Clonal Potato Planting Materials
  6. Sexual Propagation of Potato (TPS)
  7. Postharvest Utilization of Potato
  8. Control of Sweetpotato Viruses
  9. Integrated Management of Sweetpotato Pests
  10. Propagation of Sweetpotato Planting Materials
  11. Postharvest Utilization of Sweetpotato
  12. Breeding for High Dry Matter in Sweetpotato
  13. Potato Production in Rice-Wheat Systems
  14. Sustainable Land Use in the Andes

 "CIP's plan for this time period includes a resnbsp;"CIP's plan for this time period includes a research agenda updated to reflect important changes taking place among its commodities within the global marketplace. In general, globalization of the marketplace is seen as offering important opportunities for CIP collaboration and investment, albeit within circumscribed environmental parameters. As potato production continues its dramatic 30-year expansion in developing countries--and as economic liberalization encourages foreign industry to enter LDC markets--there is a concurrent need to develop environmentally friendly production systems capable of overcoming numerous yield-reducing factors. Such systems will encompass a wide range of genetically enriched varieties grown in fields where farmers practice integrated management of nutrients, pests, and diseases. CIP's plan also calls for the development of technologies that provide producers with access to more diversified markets and, at the same time, protect endangered upper watersheds."
 

Because of the high rates of return from previous CIP investments in pest and disease management, IPM research figures prominently in the Center's research agenda. The top research priority will be to meet the challenges posed by new forms of the late blight fungus affecting potato. The second priority is bacterial wilt, the second most important potato disease in developing countries.

In the case of sweet

In the case of sweetpotato, the Center will use high-dry-matter accessions to improve varieties targeted for use in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia (project 13). The principal objective of this research--as identified in the most recent priority-setting exercise--is to provide high-dry-matter cultivars suitable for consumption and for use as feed, starch, and flour.

Other areas of emphasis are genetic conservation and enhancement, continuing to build and work with partnerships (although mention is made that many partners have suffered devastating budget cuts) and natural resource management.


Contributors

Working Group 3

298> > 15IDTH=52>Fax:DTH=52>Ph:
Abbott, John D.Ph:(515) 223-6217
Technical ManagerFax: (515) 223-4599
Herbicide Products Business Unitemail: <john.abbott@cp.novartis.com>
NOVARTIS CROP PROTECTION
1501 - 50th Street, Suite 150
West Des Moines, IA 50266
 
Anishetty, N. MurthiPh: 52254652
Senior OfficerFax:52256347/52253152
Plant Genetic Resources Groupemail: <Murthi.Anishetty@fao.org>
Plant Production and Protection Division
Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN
Room: C-708
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00100 Rome, Italy
 
Chadha, K.L.Ph:91 11-578-4877
Horticulture Department, ICARFax: 91 11 -576-6420 or -575-1719
Division of Fruits & Horticultural Technology email:<naas@del2.vsnl.net.in>
IARI, New Delhi-110 012, India
 
 
Coleman, Robert G.Ph: (407) 862-0260
Agricultural/Horticultural Public Relations Fax:(407) 862-0260
Coleman Communications, Inc.email:
326 Sabal Park Place #100
Longwood, FL 32779
 
Cuartero, JesusPh:34-52-552656
Estacion Experimental la MayoraFax: 34-52-552677
29750 Algarrobo-Costaemail: <cuartero@eelm.csic.es>
Malaga, Spain
 
Dixon.GeoffPh:44 - (0) 1563-830251
GreenGene Int.Fax:44 - (0) 1563-830251
University of Strathclydeemail: <113541.1364D>email: <113541.1364@compuserve.com>
Helenton Mote, Symington By - Ayr
Kilmamock, Ayshire
KA1 5PP, Scotland, UK
 
Erez, AmnonPh:972-3-9683392
Institute of HorticultureFax: 972-3-9669583
A.R.O. The Volcani Centeremail: <vhamnn@volcani.agri.gov.il>
P.O. Box 6
Bet-Dagan, 50250 Israel
 
Galante, EnnioPh:39-2-23699-425
Professor, Observatory on Agricultural Fax:39-2-23699-411
Research - CNR email:<galante@icm.mi.cnr.it>
Via Bassini, 15
20133 Milan, Italy
 
Gunawan, Livy WinataPh: 62-251-323081 ext. 262
Horticulturist/Plant BiotechnologistFax: 62-251-622202
Department of Agronomyemail:
Faculty of Agriculture
Bogor Agricultural University
Jalan Raya Pajajaran
Bogor 16143, Indonesia
 
Ing, GeorgePh:(541) 386-1008
ManagerFax:(541) 386-1177
Washington Tree Fruitemail:
Research Commission
P.O. Box 1009
White Salmon, WA 986H=233>
White Salmon, WA 98672-1009
 
Jensen, Merle.H.Ph:(520) 621-5243
Assoc. Director, Ag Experiment Station Fax:(520) 621-7196
Assistant Dean, Sponsored Researchemail:
College of Agriculture, Forbes Bldg, Rm 306
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
 
Lawson, Roger H.Ph:(301) 504-5912
National Program LeaderFax: (301) 504-5467
Horticulture and Sugar Cropsemail:
Beltsville Agricultural Research Center
USDA/Agricultural Research Service
Beltsville, MD 20705 Beltsville, MD 20705
 
Lee, Jung-MtungPh:
Professor in HorticultureFax: 82-331-202-1740
Kyung Hee Universityemail: <jmlee@nms.kyunghee.ac.kr>
V.P. of the Korean Society for
Horticultural Science
 
Manuwoto, SjafridaPh: 62-251-326429 or 323081 ext. 271
Dean, Faculty of AgricultureFax: 62-251-312032
Bogor Agricultural Universityemail: <pertaipb@server.indo.net.id>
Fakultas Pertanian IPB
Jl. Raya Pajajaran
Bogor 16143, Indonesia
 
Martinelli, A WIDTH=233>
Martinelli, AlessioPh: 39-533-399431 or 39-335-6370981
Professor, Observatory on Agricultural Fax:39-533-399441
Research - CNRemail: <amartinelli@unacoa.it>
CIV. Consorzio Italiano Vivaisti
Via Romea 116,
44020 S. Giuseppe di Comacchio
(Ferrara), Italy
 
McLaughlin, EdPh:(607) 255-3169
Professor of MarketingFax: (607) 255-4776
Cornell Universityemail:
Ithaca, NY
 
Means, KathyPh:(302) 738-7100
Vice PresidentFax:(302) 731-2409
(302) 731-2409
Produce Marketing Associationemail: <www.pma.com>
P.O. Box 6036
Newark, DE 19714-6036
 
Moulton, KirbyPh:(510) 642-5449
Department of AgriculturalFax: (510) 643-3075
and Resource Economicsemail: <moulton@are.berkeley.edu>
University of California
207 Giannini Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
 
Park, Kuen WooPh:82-2-920-1338
Dept. of Horticultural ScienceFax: 82-2-929-5317 or 921-2891
Korea Universityemail: <kuenwp@kuccnx.korea.ac.kr>
136-701, .korea.ac.kr>
136-701, Seoul, Korea
 
Pinstrup-Andersen, PerPh: (202) 862-5633
Director GeneralFax: (202) 467-4439
International Food Policy email: <P.PINSTRUP-ANDERSEN@cgnet.com>
Research Institute
1200 - 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036-3006
 
Popple, SuePh:171-921-1174
Head, Horticulture ScienceFax: 171-921-1167
Agriculture and Food Technology Div.email: <k.l.lang@aftd.maff.gov.uk>
Chief Scientists Group
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food
RooH=52>
Room 653, St. Christopher House
Southwark Street
London SE1 0UD, England
 
Possingham, John V.Ph: 61-8-8272-3406
Chair, Viticulture SectionFax: 61 8-8272-3406
Int. Society for Horticultural Science email:<possingham@esc.net.au>
P.O. Box 273
Adelaide, Australia 5001
 
Sass, PálPh:36-1/166-4005
Prof. Dr.Fax:36-1/166-5049
Chairman, Hungarian Nationalemail: <rekt@hoya.kee.hu>
Committee of ISHS
University of Horticulture and Food
H-1118 Budapest
Villányi út 29-43, Hungary
 
Seager, NickyPh:64-6 354-9289 (2/27/98)
20 Haast PlaceFax:
Palmerston Northemail: <nandn@xtra.co.nz> (2/27/98
New Zealand
 
Spharim, I.Ph:972-3-9683392
Institute of HorticultureFax: 972-3-9669583
A.R.O. TheVolcani Centeremail:
P.O. Box 6
Bet-Dagan, 50250 Israel
 
Sulzberger, Edward W.Ph: 51-1 349-5619
51-1 349-5619
Senior AdvisorFax:51-1 349-5632
Office of the Director Generalemail: <e.sulzberger@cgnet.com>
International Potato Center
Apartado 1558
Lima 12, Peru
 
Tsou, Samson C.W.Ph: 886-6 583-7801 Ext. 101
Director GeneralFax: 886-6 583-0009
Asian Vegetable Research & Dev. Center email:<cstsou@netra.avrdc.org.tw>
P.O. Box 42
Shanhua, Tainan
74199 Taiwan
Republic of China
 
van Oosten, Henk J.Ph: 31-70-378-5enk J.Ph: 31-70-378-5727
Natl. Council for Agric. Research (NRLO) Fax:31-70-378-6149
Postbus 20401email:<h.j.van.oosten@nrlo.agro.nl>
2500 EK den Haag
The Netherlands
 
Weerts, J.Ph:32-2-206.73.09 or 72.11
Director Assistant Fax: 32-2-206.75.53 or 75.35
Ministere des Classes Moyennes email:
et de L'Agriculture
Manhattan Office Tower
Avenue du Boulevard, 21
1210 Brussels, Belgium
 
Williams, Rob J.Ph:44-1491 832111
CAB InternationalFax:
CAB InternationalFax: 44-1491 833508
Wallingford, Oxonemail: <R.WILLIAMS@cabi.org>
OX10 8DE, United Kingdom
 
Young, EricPh:(919) 515-2717
Assistant DirectorFax: (919) 515-7745
NC Agricultural Research Serviceemail: <eric_young@ncsu.edu>
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695


WCHR Home   WCHR 1   WCHR 2   WCHR 3   WCHR 4   WCHR 5   Search  

© WCHR
wchr.agrsci.unibo.it/wc3/robitail.html   Created 5 May 1998   Maintained by E. Muzzi, M. Ventura, D. Verzoni   lcorelli@agrsci.unibo.it
ML>